| Smell the Coffee I wrote this essay in November 2002 and published it on the Ming Report. It still is as applicable to our present situation as it was then: I was thinking about the contrast between my two grandmothers’ kitchens at breakfast time. Grandmother Heath was up before dawn. She stoked up the fire in her cook stove with cobs and a chock of hickory and set the percolator on the back burner. It would burble and sing and the aroma of strong coffee would fill her kitchen and waft through the house calling the family to breakfast. Each perc re-circulated and strengthened the brew. Grandmother Heath’s breakfasts fueled you for the days’ work. The Heaths were farmers and Democrats with a big Capital D. do her hair, and descend in time to fill the top receptacle of her coffee maker from the kettle. The smell it created as it Grandmother Hays’ breakfasts barely assuaged the pangs of morning hunger. The Hays were town dwelling people trickled down through the grounds was as timid and weak as the uniformly insipid brew that it produced. of business and Republican with an emphasized R. Grandmother Hays’ breakfasts barely assuaged the pangs of morning hunger. The Hays were town dwelling people of business and Republican with an emphasized R. It struck me that their contrasting approaches to breakfast is much like the contrasting approaches to economic crisis of our two political parties. One produces a barely colored hot beverage, the other a potent brew with strength and the power to lead you to the breakfast table. It is time for breakfast in the American economy. It is time to advance a Democratic economic stimulus package with a tax cut as its centerpiece but a tax cut to benefit the people who need it most in a faltering economy. Wage earners or self-employed people making $70,000 or less a year each pay the first 15% of each dollar they earn to the Federal government in payroll taxes. Yes, I know that on paper one half of that amount is assessed against the employer, but the economic effect is the same as if the entire tax were deducted from the employees pay. The payroll tax funds Social Security, SSI and Medicare and, when “loaned” to the Federal treasury it funds the operations of government. Rents, royalties, dividends and interest an capital gains income do not bear this tax nor is it assessed against any wage, salary or self-employment income above the $70,000.00 cutoff. Workers who do not earn enough to incur the income tax still bear this 15% burden, Wage earners in the lowest income tax bracket bear a real tax burden of 29%. A Democratic economic stimulus package should include a plan to abolish the $70,000.00 Social Security Tax cap on earned income, the $125,000.00 cap on Medicare Taxes and impose the tax equally on all income while cutting the rate in half. It is a policy of tax reform rather than a naked rate cut and one that would benefit those who need relief most, wage earners and small business while funding the extension of Medicare to cover prescription drugs. A Democratic economic stimulus package should be designed to increase purchasing power and strength at the bottom from which it will percolate up rather than pouring money in at the top to trickle down where it will be absorbed by layer after layer leaving the foundation of the economic structure resting on dry and unstable sand. It is time to come to breakfast. http://www.mingreport.com November 8, 2002 |
| A Clear and Present Danger Written and published on the Ming Report on January 31, 2003. A decent respect? Not Yet! In a democracy the power of government is circumscribed by the will of the people. In our Constitutional democracy the mechanisms by which the people may express their common will are codified, delimited and protected. The First Amendment to our Constitution in its enumeration of freedoms of speech, of the press, of conscience, of assembly, and of petition for redress protects an unenumerated freedom that is more basic and essential to democracy – the Freedom of Inquiry. Each of the enumerated freedoms serve to enhance and protect each citizen in his right to inquire of his government; to be informed as to the actions that government takes in the name of the nation; and to demand that the government provide a justification for the action that it determines to take. That right to question and to demand answers is essential to the proper exercise of the highest office in the nation – that of voter – in that constitutionally mandated biennial review of the acts of the governors. No power of government more directly affects each citizen than the power to make war. The cost in lives and the cost in treasure fall on each household, if the impact is unequally distributed. That is why the decision to wage war on behalf of the nation is strictly delimited by our Constitution and carefully distributed between the legislative and executive branches. The right of the people to inquire imposes a duty upon the governors to answer and to be forthcoming, candid and complete in providing to the citizens the information on which the decision to resort to war is made. For the first time in its history the President of the United States has promulgated a doctrine of preemptive war. For the first time in its history the United States proposes to resort to war without the intended foe having provoked the act by an act of naked aggression. It is incumbent therefore that the President must first make the case that the intended foe poses a Clear and Present Danger to the security of the United States and that the case he makes is supported by Clear and Convincing evidence. That case must be made not only to the people of the United States but also to the people of the world if this nation is to retain its posture as a protector of freedom and a beacon of liberty to the world. The case cannot be constructed of conjecture and inference upon conjecture. It cannot be built upon the shifting sand of “could” and “might”. Much more than posturing and playground catcalls are required from the President’s bully pulpit. When a planned war will commence by raining massive destruction on a city of 4.8 Million men, women and children nothing less than compelling direct evidence that Iraq represents a Clear and Present Danger to this nation’s security and the peace of the world will do. A decent respect to the opinions of mankind demands it. |
| A Hard and Bitter Peace May 28, 2003 - On May 1, 2003 the President of the United States donned a flight suit, climbed into the cockpit of a Navy jet to commence the grueling 30 mile flight from a California airbase to the deck of an aircraft carrier idling offshore. Landing on the carrier in calm seas and a friendly wind he alit from the plane to shake the hands of the crew and captain. The purpose of his dangerous mission in a plane piloted by one of the nation’s most experienced naval aviators was to announce the end of combat operations in the Second Iraqi War. This delicate mission, recognizing the sacrifice of 139 British and American soldiers in the pursuit of a safer more congenial Iraqi regime, was emblematic of the bravery of a great leader. He spoke for the television lens with the vast deep ocean for a backdrop, all the time looking past the cameras to the California shoreline slipping slowly from right to left. The speech was as genuine as the peace that it ushered in. Today, May 28, 2003, the allied death count stands at least 202. The newly free and liberated Iraqi people have killed six American soldiers in the past 24 hours. At least 63 Americans have died since the President’s awesome exhibition of stagecraft. It has been a strange welcome for the liberators of an enslaved people. Where have all the flowers gone that a grateful population was expected to strew in the paths of the liberators? Explosions blossom in their stead, the liberators paths are strewn instead with land mines, rocket propelled grenades and machine gun fire from ambush. It is the same welcome enjoyed by the Red Army when it went to liberate Afghanistan and instead commenced the dervish spin of events that ended the Soviet Union as its parts were flung away by the centrifugal force of the spinning. History is a patient teacher. Its pace is measured in decades and centuries not days and months and its lessons are hard. America’s wars in the Moslem east are far from over. Perhaps as the lesson progresses someone in Washington will examine a map and recognize that our garrisons east of Suez are surrounded by a cordon of implacable enemies and smiling “friends” that hide enduring enmity behind a amicable mask. Despite our leader’s contrary protestations we are indeed engaged in a crusade of one culture arrayed against another. Western liberal democratic tradition in which sovereignty emanates from the common consent of the people cannot reasonably expect to make common cause with a culture in which sovereignty resides solely in God. We may have seen Armies dissolve in the face of an assault of overwhelming force but we have won no victory in the Moslem east. The only peace our soldiers have won is the peace of the grave. Originally published on The Ming Report, May 28, 2003 |